For event planners, getting attendees to the destination is not simply a line item to address once the venue and programme are confirmed. It can determine whether the event starts on time at all.
Travel and event costs remain under pressure. According to the 2027 Global Business Travel Forecast by the Global Business Travel Association and ALTOUR, average global airfares are forecast to rise by 4.7% in 2026, while the cost per meeting attendee per day is expected to increase by approximately 3% to USD 263.
When dozens or hundreds of attendees need to reach one venue within a fixed window, the lowest airfare does not necessarily produce the lowest-cost journey. The complete calculation may include transfers, baggage, accommodation, coordination time and the operational cost of late arrival.
“We’re seeing corporate travel planners place increasing emphasis on the overall attendee experience, reliability and control of logistics,” says Andy Hutchinson, Director of Passenger Charter UK at Chapman Freeborn. “The journey is an important part of that experience, particularly when transporting large groups to an incentive trip, international conference or major corporate event.”
When scheduled flights do not fit the event
Chapman Freeborn recently assisted a corporate client organising an incentive trip for 130 passengers travelling from London to Dubrovnik. Scheduled services were available, but their arrival times did not fit the programme at the resort.
The team sourced two aircraft, allowing the client to select the departure airport and schedule that best suited the group. Departures were arranged through private terminals in London, while branded headrest covers extended the incentive experience into the journey itself. Both aircraft departed on time, enabling attendees to begin the programme as planned.
Scheduled flights will remain the simplest and most commercially sensible option for many groups. The calculation begins to change when sufficient seats are unavailable on one suitable service and passengers have to be divided between several flights.
“If a delay or cancellation affects just one flight, it can create problems for the wider event,” Hutchinson explains. “You can end up with people arriving at different times, additional transfer requirements and potentially key attendees missing the opening of the programme.”
This risk is particularly relevant for events with immovable schedules, including conferences, product launches, executive meetings, sporting events and corporate hospitality programmes. Music and entertainment groups may face further complexity when travelling with production equipment or specialist baggage.
Looking beyond the ticket price
There is no single passenger number at which charter automatically becomes the better option. A group of 100 people travelling from one city creates a very different requirement from 100 people departing from five locations.
The route, date, scheduled capacity, required aircraft and event priorities all influence the decision. If attendees are divided across multiple services, organisers may need to account for several airport transfers, additional coordination, separate baggage arrangements, potential overnight accommodation and the consequences of key participants arriving late.
“Charter becomes particularly interesting when a group can fill a suitable aircraft and the organiser values the ability to control the departure time, arrival airport and overall itinerary,” Hutchinson says. “We recommend comparing the complete scheduled solution with the charter option rather than assuming that one will always be better than the other.”
For incentive travel, the journey may also form part of the reward. Keeping attendees together allows the organiser to tailor the onboard experience and gives the group an opportunity to connect before reaching the destination.
Plan backwards from the opening session
A successful group movement should begin with the event schedule, not the aircraft.
If the opening session starts at 18:00 and the ground transfer takes one hour, the planner might set a target venue arrival of 16:30. This determines the latest acceptable landing time and the operational buffer that should be included in the flight schedule.
The closest airport is not always the most practical. Operating hours, slots, runway requirements, aircraft capability, passenger facilities and onward ground transport can all affect the choice. Exhibition materials, presentation equipment, sports gear or additional luggage may also influence aircraft selection and payload requirements.
The earlier these factors are assessed, the more flexibility planners have to compare aircraft, secure suitable airports and develop contingency options. Charter does not eliminate disruption: weather, air traffic control restrictions, airport slots and aircraft availability remain relevant. It does, however, allow the flight schedule to be designed around the event’s requirements rather than forcing the programme to fit an existing airline timetable.
“The best results come when the charter broker is involved early enough to understand the full event logistics,” Hutchinson adds. “If the aircraft is considered only after the venue, transfers and programme have already been fixed, some of the most effective options may no longer be available.”
Six questions to ask before moving a large group
Before choosing between scheduled flights and charter, organisers should consider:
Looking towards 2027, demand for group charter is likely to be shaped by the availability and pricing of scheduled airline capacity, particularly around major international events and peak travel periods.
For event planners, charter is not simply a premium alternative to an airline ticket. In the right circumstances, it allows the journey to be built around the event and reduces the variables standing between attendees and the opening session.